The History of ICE in American Immigration History

Erick Widman

ICE, or U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, is a relatively new agency in the history of American immigration. ICE was created in 2003 as part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Prior to the creation of ICE, immigration enforcement was carried out by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), which was part of the Department of Justice.

The creation of ICE represented a significant shift in the way that the U.S. government approached immigration enforcement. ICE was tasked with enforcing immigration laws in a more aggressive and comprehensive manner, with a particular emphasis on identifying and removing undocumented immigrants who were deemed to be a threat to national security or public safety.

Under the leadership of the Trump administration, ICE became increasingly controversial for its aggressive tactics and high-profile enforcement actions, such as workplace raids and the separation of families at the border. Many immigrant rights advocates and civil liberties groups criticized ICE for its harsh policies and for creating a climate of fear and uncertainty in immigrant communities.

In recent years, there have been calls to reform or abolish ICE, with some arguing that the agency is too focused on enforcement and not enough on other aspects of immigration policy, such as promoting legal pathways to citizenship and addressing the root causes of migration.

ICE Controversies

There have been several controversies surrounding ICE since its creation. Here are a few examples:

Treatment of detainees: ICE has been criticized for its treatment of individuals in its custody, including reports of inadequate medical care, poor living conditions, and abuse by guards.

Deportation of non-criminal immigrants: ICE has come under fire for its practice of deporting undocumented immigrants who have not committed serious crimes, including individuals who have been living and working in the U.S. for many years and have established roots in their communities.

Separation of families: The Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy, which called for the prosecution of all individuals who crossed the border illegally, led to the separation of thousands of children from their parents or guardians. The policy was widely criticized and eventually rescinded, but the effects of the separations continue to be felt.

Targeting of immigrant communities: Some critics argue that ICE’s enforcement actions have unfairly targeted immigrant communities, leading to a climate of fear and mistrust.

Lack of transparency: ICE has been criticized for its lack of transparency and accountability, with some arguing that the agency operates with little oversight and without sufficient regard for the rights and dignity of those it targets.

Reforms that have been suggested for ICE

There have been several proposals for reforming ICE, with some calling for significant changes to the agency’s structure and mission.

Abolish ICE

Some advocates have called for the outright abolition of ICE, arguing that the agency’s focus on enforcement is incompatible with a humane and just immigration system. Proponents of this approach argue that the functions currently performed by ICE could be handled by other agencies or departments, such as the Department of Justice or the Department of State.

Restructure ICE

Others have proposed restructuring ICE to focus more on humanitarian and public safety concerns, rather than simply enforcing immigration laws. This could involve separating ICE into different agencies or divisions, with different mandates and priorities.

Increase transparency and accountability

Some advocates have called for increased transparency and accountability within ICE, including greater oversight by Congress and other independent bodies. This could involve requiring ICE to report on its activities and outcomes, and establishing clearer guidelines and protocols for its operations.

Promote alternatives to detention

Rather than relying on detention as a primary means of enforcing immigration laws, some have called for increased use of alternatives to detention, such as community-based supervision programs or ankle monitoring.

Expand legal pathways to citizenship

Finally, some advocates argue that the root cause of many immigration issues is the lack of legal pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. As such, they call for reforms that would provide more opportunities for immigrants to gain legal status, including pathways to citizenship for those who meet certain criteria.

Request a Consultation

"*" indicates required fields

How Can We Help
I Have Read The Disclaimer*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.